Recurrent appearance of protective zones after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock. Export

@article{citeulike:926302, abstract = {This study was designed to test the hypothesis that protective zones appear recurrently at the initiation of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and that when shocks are delivered during protective zones, there can be a decrease in the defibrillation energy requirement. A total of 12 open-chest dogs were studied. Six dogs were included in protocol 1. After eight baseline pacing stimuli (S1) with cycle lengths of 300 ms, a strong premature stimulus (S2) (73 +/- 10 mA) was given to induce VF. In subsequent episodes, a second strong premature stimulus (S3) was given at progressively longer S2-S3 intervals in 20-ms increments. In protocol 2, we delivered unsuccessful defibrillation shocks via a transvenous defibrillation electrode placed in the right ventricular apex of six dogs. A second shock was then delivered to patch electrodes on the right ventricular outflow tract and the posterior wall of the left ventricle. The results of protocol 1 showed that the S3 terminated reentry and prevented VF only when it occurred at specific time intervals after the S2 (the protective zones). These protective zones appear recurrently up to 375 ms after the onset of VF. The results of protocol 2 showed that the total energy required for successful defibrillation was dependent on the interval between the first and second shocks. Intervals favoring effective defibrillation (protective zones) appeared recurrently for up to 280 ms after the first shock. When the second shock was delivered during a protective zone, the defibrillation energy requirement was decreased by up to 23\% (from 13.1 +/- 2.0 to 10.1 +/- 1.8 J, P < 0.003). However, when the shock was delivered outside the protective zone, a significant increase in the defibrillation energy requirement was observed. We conclude that protective zones appear recurrently at the onset of VF and after unsuccessful defibrillation shocks.}, address = {Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.}, author = {Hwang, C. and Fan, W. and Chen, P. S.}, citeulike-article-id = {926302}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8897944}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=8897944}, issn = {0002-9513}, journal = {Am J Physiol}, keywords = {second, shock}, month = {October}, number = {4 Pt 2}, posted-at = {2006-11-03 01:42:17}, priority = {5}, title = {Recurrent appearance of protective zones after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock.}, url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8897944}, volume = {271}, year = {1996} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:926302 L3 - citeulike-article-id:926302 N2 - This study was designed to test the hypothesis that protective zones appear recurrently at the initiation of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and that when shocks are delivered during protective zones, there can be a decrease in the defibrillation energy requirement. A total of 12 open-chest dogs were studied. Six dogs were included in protocol 1. After eight baseline pacing stimuli (S1) with cycle lengths of 300 ms, a strong premature stimulus (S2) (73 +/- 10 mA) was given to induce VF. In subsequent episodes, a second strong premature stimulus (S3) was given at progressively longer S2-S3 intervals in 20-ms increments. In protocol 2, we delivered unsuccessful defibrillation shocks via a transvenous defibrillation electrode placed in the right ventricular apex of six dogs. A second shock was then delivered to patch electrodes on the right ventricular outflow tract and the posterior wall of the left ventricle. The results of protocol 1 showed that the S3 terminated reentry and prevented VF only when it occurred at specific time intervals after the S2 (the protective zones). These protective zones appear recurrently up to 375 ms after the onset of VF. The results of protocol 2 showed that the total energy required for successful defibrillation was dependent on the interval between the first and second shocks. Intervals favoring effective defibrillation (protective zones) appeared recurrently for up to 280 ms after the first shock. When the second shock was delivered during a protective zone, the defibrillation energy requirement was decreased by up to 23% (from 13.1 +/- 2.0 to 10.1 +/- 1.8 J, P < 0.003). However, when the shock was delivered outside the protective zone, a significant increase in the defibrillation energy requirement was observed. We conclude that protective zones appear recurrently at the onset of VF and after unsuccessful defibrillation shocks. IS - 4 Pt 2 JF - Am J Physiol SN - 0002-9513 AD - Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. TI - Recurrent appearance of protective zones after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock. VL - 271 KW - second KW - shock AU - Hwang, C AU - Fan, W AU - Chen, PS PY - 1996/10// UR - http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8897944 ER -