CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Correlation Clustering: maximizing agreements via semidefinite programming Export

In SODA '04: Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM-SIAM Symposium On Discrete Algorithms (2004), pp. 526-527.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


vlee's tags for this article

clustering graph signed_graph

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

We consider the Correlation Clustering problem introduced in [2]. Given a graph G = ( V,E ) where each edge is labeled either "+" (similar) or "-" (different), we want to cluster the nodes so that the + edges lie within the clusters and the -- edges lie between clusters. Specifically, we want to maximize agreements --- the number of + edges within clusters and -- edges between clusters. This problem is NP-Hard [2]. We give a 0.7666-approximation algorithm for maximizing agreements on any graph even when the edges have non-negative weights (along with labels) and we want to maximize the weight of agreements. These were posed as open problems in [2]. Previously the only results known were a trivial 0.5-approximation for arbitrary edge weighted graphs, and a PTAS with unit edge weights when | E | = Ω(| V | 2 ). Somewhat surprisingly, our algorithm always produces a clustering with at most 6 clusters . As a corollary we get a 0.7666-approximation algorithm for the k -clustering variant of the problem where we may create at most k clusters. A major component of this algorithm is a simple, easy-to-analyze algorithm that by itself achieves an approximation ratio of 0.75, opening at most 4 clusters.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.