![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
voigt's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Fun with functional dependenciesby: T. Hallgren
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThis paper illustrates how Haskell's type class system can be used to express computations. Since computations on the type level are performed by the type checker, these computations are static (i.e., performed at compile-time), and, since the type system is decidable, they always terminate. Haskell thus provides a means to express static computations, and has a clear distinction between static and dynamic computations. Instance declarations define predicates over types, or in the case of multi-parameter classes, relations between types. With functional dependencies, multi-parameter classes directly specify functions, and, thanks to them, you can get the type checker to compute the values of function applications, rather than just checking that the result of an application is what you say it is. This way of expressing computation gives us the power of a small first-order functional programming language, with pattern matching and structural recursion. We can easily define things like booleans, natural numbers, lists, and functions over these types. We give some examples of completely static computations, the most elaborate one being an implementation of insertion sort. We also give examples where static and dynamic computations are mixed.
BibTeX record
RIS record