CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. Export

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 11, No. 1. (1985), pp. 70-84.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


voiklis's tags for this article

basic-categories category-learning-use _d_ informational-constraints

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Three object-recognition experiments with 36 undergraduates tested the category-differentiation and preferred-level hypotheses of the basic level advantage in object identification. It is noted that, when people are asked to decide whether an object is in a given category, they generally respond faster when the category is at the basic level (e.g., car) than when it is at the superordinate level (e.g., vehicle) or the subordinate level (e.g., sedan). Basic categories have shorter and more frequent names, are learned earlier, and are usually more highly differentiated than other categories (they are both specific and distinctive), but it is not clear which of these factors is responsible for the faster response to basic categories. Results of the present experiments indicate that objects could be identified fastest as members of differentiated categories, even when such categories had longer names and were learned later than less differentiated categories; atypical subordinate categories (e.g., racing car) that were highly differentiated were responded to as fast as basic categories in object recognition. Findings rule out the hypothesis that objects are necessarily identified as members of basic categories before further identification. Implications of these findings for the use of category names as definite description in discourse are discussed.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.