![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
voiklis's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
When Three Heads Are Better Than Twoedited by: Ron Sun, Naomi MiyakeIn Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2006), pp. 2375-2381.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe present study investigated the effects of both group size and heterogeneity in relevant math skill on collaborative problem solving. Overall, triads demonstrated better reasoning and more effective cryptarithmetic problem solving than dyads and singletons. Importantly, triads outperformed the best individuals in a nominal groups analysis. Triads were also better able than dyads to take advantage of heterogeneity in math skill. The results suggest that some specific advantages of group collaboration may be more likely to be realized in triads than dyads, and that triads may be an optimal group size when critical evaluation and reasoning are required for a task.
BibTeX record
RIS record