![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
wandall's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
If not evidence, then what? Or does medicine really need a base?by: Ross E. Upshur
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractAbstract This essay analyses the concept of 'base' in relation to its use in evidence-based medicine (EBM). It evaluates the extent to which evidence provides a sufficient base for health care to rest and discusses whether medicine needs a base, and, if so, what are the other possible candidates. This paper will argue that EBM is linked epistemologically to the theory of foundationalism and shows how important criticisms of EBM emerge from anti-foundationalist epistemologies and interpretive frameworks. Drawing from recent writings in the philosophy of science, it is argued that there is a need to see multiple perspectives relevant to the practice and understanding of medicine.
BibTeX record
RIS record