wandall's expert_judgment [12 articles] Export

Recent papers added to wandall's library classified by the tag expert_judgment. You can also see everyone's expert_judgment.

Hide details

	Engaging Expert Peers in the Development of Risk Assessments [My Copy] Risk Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 6. (December 2007), pp. 1609-1621. by Patterson, Jacqueline, Bette Meek, et al. M. E., Strawson, E. Joan, Liteplo, G. Robert posted to expertise expert_judgment experts peer_review risk_assessment by wandall on 2007-12-19 12:41:45 as
	Evaluation of historical control data in carcinogenicity studies. [My Copy] Hum Exp Toxicol, Vol. 22, No. 10. (October 2003), pp. 541-549. by H. Greim, H. P. Gelbke, U. Reuter, H. W. Thielmann, L. Edler posted to animal_studies carcinogen data expert_judgment histrorical_control by wandall on 2007-07-10 00:41:05 as
	We should be designing better experiments. [My Copy] Vet Anaesth Analg, Vol. 30, No. 2. (April 2003), pp. 59-61. by M. F. Festing posted to animal_studies experiment experimental_design expert_judgment statistics by wandall on 2007-07-09 12:46:55 as
	The need for statistical analysis of rodent micronucleus test data. Comment on the paper by Ashby and Tinwell. [My Copy] Mutat Res, Vol. 329, No. 2. (July 1995), pp. 221-224. by M. F. Festing, D. P. Lovell posted to animal_studies expert_judgment statistics by wandall on 2007-07-09 12:43:27 as
	Dynamics of Technical Controversy [My Copy] by Allan C. Mazur posted to controversy expert_judgment expertise experts by wandall on 2007-03-31 14:20:28 as
	Does Concern-Driven Risk Management Provide a Viable Alternative to QRA [My Copy] Risk Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 1. (February 2007), pp. 27-43. by Anthony T. Cox, Louis posted to expert_judgment risk_assessment by wandall on 2007-03-15 22:18:13 as
	Expert Judgment and High Level Nuclear Waste Management [My Copy] Review of Policy Research, Vol. 10, No. 4. (1991), pp. 114-126. by Patricia Fleming posted to expert_judgment risk_management by wandall on 2007-03-15 21:52:13 as
	A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. [My Copy] JAMA, Vol. 268, No. 2. (8 July 1992), pp. 240-248. by E. M. Antman, J. Lau, B. Kupelnick, F. Mosteller, T. C. Chalmers posted to expert_judgment judgement rct by wandall on 2007-03-10 13:56:59 as
	At what degree of belief in a research hypothesis is a trial in humans justified? [My Copy] J Eval Clin Pract, Vol. 8, No. 2. (May 2002), pp. 269-276. by B. Djulbegovic, I. Hozo posted to expert_judgment false_positive justification by wandall on 2007-03-10 11:15:48 as
	Acceptable regret in medical decision making. [My Copy] Med Hypotheses, Vol. 53, No. 3. (September 1999), pp. 253-259. by B. Djulbegovic, I. Hozo, A. Schwartz, K. M. McMasters posted to expert_judgment false_positive judgement uncertainty by wandall on 2007-03-10 11:08:02 as
	Why Most Published Research Findings Are False [My Copy] PLoS Medicine, Vol. 2, No. 8. (1 August 2005), e124. by John P. Ioannidis posted to conflict_of_interest expert_judgment false_positive judgement registry replication statistics uncertainty by wandall on 2007-03-09 15:04:15 as along with 13 people and 2 groups whitead VGreiff toomash marcela silberbauer treangen jmeppley hpiwowar ggorjan biomcgary devender willie_gt gvdh Jiang Research Group FlowCytometry
	The over-optimism among experts in assessment and foresight [My Copy] Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 71, No. 4. (May 2004), pp. 341-363. by Gunther Tichy posted to expert_judgment by wandall on 2006-11-09 15:23:39 as

Note: You may cite this page as: http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/tag/expert_judgment

CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.

transfedt-studie	70
risk_assessment	64
value	46
statistics	35
toxicology	34
bias	28
evidence	22
policy	19
uncertainty	18
risk	17
epidemiology	16
epistemology	15
animal_studies	14
false_positive	14
scientific_method	14
consequentialism	13
false_positivefalse_negative	13
precaution	13
epistemic_values	12
expert_judgment	12
judgement	12
transfedtsyrer	12
value_judgment	12
conflict_of_interest	11
explanation	11
regulation	11
risk_management	11
ethics	10
publication	10
scientific_aim	10
chemicals	9
philosophy_of_science	9
reach	9
research_ethics	9
causality	8
controversy	8
epistemic_normativity	8
experiment	8
industry	8
objectivity	8
philosophy	8
scientific_practice	8
bias_ra	7
ebt	7
evidence-based	7
quality	7
carcinogen	6
conservative	6
exposure	6
scientific_controversy	6
virtue_ethics	6
data	5
ebm	5
epa	5
hormesis	5
justification	5
mechanism	5
metaanalysis	5
metaethics	5
scientific_norms	5
bayesian	4
criterion_of_rightness	4
dioxine	4
error	4
eu	4
expertise	4
histopathology	4
naturalism	4
peer_review	4
rct	4
science	4
sociology_of_science	4
bisphenol_a	3
burden_of_proof	3
database	3
experimental_design	3
false_negative	3
future	3
intrinsic_value	3
intuition	3
judgment	3
laudan	3
registry	3
risk_trade-off	3
scientific_expertise	3
threshold	3
truth	3
virtue_epistemology	3
vom_saal	3
basis_of_normativity	2
benzene	2
blinding	2
clinical_trial	2
cohort_studies	2
data_manipulation	2
dose-response	2
epistemic_divergence	2
experts	2
fact	2
factvalue	2
feminism	2
foresight	2
ghost_authorship	2
glp	2
gmo	2
induction	2
kantianism	2
mammography	2
manipulation	2
normativity	2
probability	2
purchase	2
ra_guidelines	2
realism	2
reasons	2
reflective_equilibrium	2
relativism	2
replication	2
study_design	2
target_group	2
trust	2
abduction	1
acne	1
acrylamide	1
aliens	1
anomaly	1
applied_science	1
autonomy	1
backcasting	1
case-study	1
climate_change	1
confounding	1
conservatism	1
construction	1
crime	1
darwinism	1
deontology	1
detection_level	1
disease	1
doubt	1
empiricism	1
endocrinology	1
epistemic_relativism	1
extraterrestrials	1
fraud	1
functional_foods	1
gamesmanship	1
gene	1
goal	1
grp	1
hare	1
histrorical_control	1
human_data	1
hypothesis_acceptance	1
interview	1
in_vitro	1
iris	1
justice	1
kant	1
kitcher	1
lead	1
longino	1
low-dose	1
maximally_exposed_individual	1
metabolism	1
mice	1
milgram	1
milk	1
models	1
moral_realism	1
nafta	1
network	1
norms	1
nuclear_waste	1
nutrition	1
obesity	1
observation	1
opskrift	1
pesticide	1
phenotype	1
phenotypes	1
podcast	1
population	1
precedence	1
prediction	1
prescription	1
psychiatry	1
putnam	1
radiation	1
rationality_of_science	1
reasoned_opinion	1
reasoning	1
rodents	1
rorty	1
ross	1
rousseau	1
saccharin	1
sample	1
scientific_consensus	1
selective_reporting	1
sjovt	1
social	1
social_epistemology	1
social_value	1
standards	1
strain	1
sustainable	1
trials_registry	1
triglyceride	1
uinteressant	1
undervisning	1
uredelighed	1
validation	1
variance	1
videnskabelig	1
virtual	1
women_in_philosophy	1
worst_case_scenario	1
wto	1

wandall's expert_judgment [12 articles] Export

wandall's tags