wandall's scientific_method [14 articles] Export

Recent papers added to wandall's library classified by the tag scientific_method. You can also see everyone's scientific_method.

Hide details

	Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. [My Copy] ILAR J, Vol. 43, No. 4. (2002), pp. 244-258. by M. F. Festing, D. G. Altman posted to animal_studies experiment experimental_design research_ethics scientific_method scientific_practice statistics by wandall on 2007-07-09 12:35:58 as along with 1 person HugoMarcelo
	What Is the Question concerning the Rationality of Science? [My Copy] Philosophy of Science, Vol. 52, No. 4. (1985), pp. 517-537. by Harvey Siegel posted to rationality_of_science scientific_aim scientific_method by wandall on 2007-06-26 17:25:07 as
	Scientific Values and Civic Virtues [My Copy] (09 July 2005) by Noretta Koertge posted to scientific_method scientific_norms value by wandall on 2007-06-04 14:53:28 as
	Wofur sprechen die Daten? [My Copy] Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Vol. 35, No. 1., 13. by Thomas Bartelborth posted to abduction bayesian data induction scientific_method scientific_practice statistics by wandall on 2007-04-13 13:38:53 as
	Are Methodological Rules Hypothetical Imperatives? [My Copy] Philosophy of Science, Vol. 59, No. 3. (1992), pp. 498-507. by David B. Resnik posted to scientific_method scientific_norms by wandall on 2007-04-10 13:59:31 as
	Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series) [My Copy] (15 August 1996) by Deborah G. Mayo posted to error experiment scientific_method scientific_practice by wandall on 2007-03-31 14:17:36 as along with 1 person rkinnear
	How to read a paper: Papers that report drug trials [My Copy] BMJ, Vol. 315, No. 7106. (23 August 1997), pp. 480-483. by Trisha Greenhalgh posted to publication quality scientific_method by wandall on 2006-12-15 13:40:17 as along with 5 people cgraffeo Borelli inbetweener avidran ajaymalik
	How to read a paper. Getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). [My Copy] BMJ (Clinical research ed.), Vol. 315, No. 7102. (26 July 1997), pp. 243-246. by T. Greenhalgh posted to quality scientific_method by wandall on 2006-12-15 13:38:15 as along with 7 people and 3 groups guhjy LancreCastle willwade Borelli inbetweener avidran ajaymalik AssistiveTechnology Sciences_communication_societe PostureMobility
	How to read a paper: Assessing the methodological quality of published papers [My Copy] BMJ, Vol. 315, No. 7103. (2 August 1997), pp. 305-308. by Trisha Greenhalgh posted to quality scientific_method by wandall on 2006-12-15 13:36:34 as along with 10 people and 3 groups guhjy bennyefendie annathomson willwade Borelli inbetweener nwolf avidran ajaymalik gareth AssistiveTechnology Sciences_communication_societe PostureMobility
	How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) [My Copy] BMJ, Vol. 315, No. 7109. (13 September 1997), pp. 672-675. by Trisha Greenhalgh posted to metaanalysis scientific_method statistics study_design by wandall on 2006-12-15 13:34:54 as along with 9 people and 1 group philipeto sabrenawells iskanbasal coffeekev Borelli inbetweener soumitri_varadarajan avidran ajaymalik Sciences_communication_societe
	The comparative power of the discriminant methods used in toxicological pathology. [My Copy] Toxicol Pathol, Vol. 33, No. 4. (2005), pp. 490-494. by T. Holland posted to blinding histopathology scientific_method statistics toxicology by wandall on 2006-11-09 20:19:24 as
	A survey of discriminant methods used in toxicological histopathology. [My Copy] Toxicol Pathol, Vol. 29, No. 2. (r 2001), pp. 269-273. by T. Holland posted to blinding histopathology scientific_method toxicology by wandall on 2006-11-09 20:18:06 as
	175th anniversary lecture. Medical journals and the shaping of medical knowledge. [My Copy] Lancet, Vol. 352, No. 9145. (6 1998), pp. 2001-2006. by J. P. Vandenbroucke posted to bias evidence scientific_method scientific_practice by wandall on 2006-11-09 19:43:20 as
	`Through thousands of errors we reach the truth'--but how? On the epistemic roles of error in scientific practice [My Copy] Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 36, No. 3. (September 2005), pp. 539-556. by Jutta Schickore posted to error philosophy scientific_method scientific_practice by wandall on 2006-11-09 15:19:51 as

Note: You may cite this page as: http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/tag/scientific_method

CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.

transfedt-studie	70
risk_assessment	64
value	46
statistics	35
toxicology	34
bias	28
evidence	22
policy	19
uncertainty	18
risk	17
epidemiology	16
epistemology	15
animal_studies	14
false_positive	14
scientific_method	14
consequentialism	13
false_positivefalse_negative	13
precaution	13
epistemic_values	12
expert_judgment	12
judgement	12
transfedtsyrer	12
value_judgment	12
conflict_of_interest	11
explanation	11
regulation	11
risk_management	11
ethics	10
publication	10
scientific_aim	10
chemicals	9
philosophy_of_science	9
reach	9
research_ethics	9
causality	8
controversy	8
epistemic_normativity	8
experiment	8
industry	8
objectivity	8
philosophy	8
scientific_practice	8
bias_ra	7
ebt	7
evidence-based	7
quality	7
carcinogen	6
conservative	6
exposure	6
scientific_controversy	6
virtue_ethics	6
data	5
ebm	5
epa	5
hormesis	5
justification	5
mechanism	5
metaanalysis	5
metaethics	5
scientific_norms	5
bayesian	4
criterion_of_rightness	4
dioxine	4
error	4
eu	4
expertise	4
histopathology	4
naturalism	4
peer_review	4
rct	4
science	4
sociology_of_science	4
bisphenol_a	3
burden_of_proof	3
database	3
experimental_design	3
false_negative	3
future	3
intrinsic_value	3
intuition	3
judgment	3
laudan	3
registry	3
risk_trade-off	3
scientific_expertise	3
threshold	3
truth	3
virtue_epistemology	3
vom_saal	3
basis_of_normativity	2
benzene	2
blinding	2
clinical_trial	2
cohort_studies	2
data_manipulation	2
dose-response	2
epistemic_divergence	2
experts	2
fact	2
factvalue	2
feminism	2
foresight	2
ghost_authorship	2
glp	2
gmo	2
induction	2
kantianism	2
mammography	2
manipulation	2
normativity	2
probability	2
purchase	2
ra_guidelines	2
realism	2
reasons	2
reflective_equilibrium	2
relativism	2
replication	2
study_design	2
target_group	2
trust	2
abduction	1
acne	1
acrylamide	1
aliens	1
anomaly	1
applied_science	1
autonomy	1
backcasting	1
case-study	1
climate_change	1
confounding	1
conservatism	1
construction	1
crime	1
darwinism	1
deontology	1
detection_level	1
disease	1
doubt	1
empiricism	1
endocrinology	1
epistemic_relativism	1
extraterrestrials	1
fraud	1
functional_foods	1
gamesmanship	1
gene	1
goal	1
grp	1
hare	1
histrorical_control	1
human_data	1
hypothesis_acceptance	1
interview	1
in_vitro	1
iris	1
justice	1
kant	1
kitcher	1
lead	1
longino	1
low-dose	1
maximally_exposed_individual	1
metabolism	1
mice	1
milgram	1
milk	1
models	1
moral_realism	1
nafta	1
network	1
norms	1
nuclear_waste	1
nutrition	1
obesity	1
observation	1
opskrift	1
pesticide	1
phenotype	1
phenotypes	1
podcast	1
population	1
precedence	1
prediction	1
prescription	1
psychiatry	1
putnam	1
radiation	1
rationality_of_science	1
reasoned_opinion	1
reasoning	1
rodents	1
rorty	1
ross	1
rousseau	1
saccharin	1
sample	1
scientific_consensus	1
selective_reporting	1
sjovt	1
social	1
social_epistemology	1
social_value	1
standards	1
strain	1
sustainable	1
trials_registry	1
triglyceride	1
uinteressant	1
undervisning	1
uredelighed	1
validation	1
variance	1
videnskabelig	1
virtual	1
women_in_philosophy	1
worst_case_scenario	1
wto	1

wandall's scientific_method [14 articles] Export

wandall's tags