![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
wcrosbie's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Reconfigurability: creating new courses from existing learning objects will always be difficult!by: C. Tompsett
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe suggestion that new courses can be constructed from existing learning objects appears technically self-evident but remains unproven. Despite increasing evidence that learning objects can provide a suitable structure for constructing courses most evidence is based on creating learning objects, either through restructuring existing materials or as a set of newly created learning objects. There is little evidence for building a new course from existing learning objects where any significant number of these have been developed for a different course elsewhere. Authors who adopt a constructivist model of knowledge might view this lack of evidence as confirmation of the inherent difficulty of integrating resources created within different communities. Those following a scientific model of knowledge would view this as a temporary problem that will be resolved when a sufficient volume of materials exists in repositories. This paper argues that reconfiguration of learning objects to create new courses is significantly more complex than is currently recognized, even within a scientific framework of knowledge. By implication, far more research is needed to understand reconfiguration and re-integration than initial 'creation'.
BibTeX record
RIS record