CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Estimation of size of distal ureteral stones: noncontrast CT scan versus actual size.

by: T. A. Kishore, Renato N. Pedro, Bryan Hinck, Manoj Monga
Urology, Vol. 72, No. 4. (October 2008), pp. 761-764, doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.047  Key: citeulike:11506882

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

To determine the accuracy of stone size determination by computed tomography (CT) for distal ureteral calculi. A total of 76 patients who presented with distal ureteral stone were evaluated with CT. Of the 76 patients, 41 successfully passed the stone spontaneously and intact. The largest stone size dimension measured on CT by an experienced endourologist was compared with the actual measured size of the spontaneously expulsed stone as measured by digital calipers. The mean actual size of the stone was 4.51 mm (range 1-9.2, SD +/- 1.91). The mean largest dimension measured on CT was 5.51 mm (range 2-11.2, SD +/- 2.09). The correlation coefficient (r) when comparing the actual size with the CT scan measurement was -0.022. When the largest stone dimension was obtained on the craniocaudal CT images, the correlation coefficient was 0.097. When the largest stone dimension was obtained on the axial CT image, the correlation coefficient was -0.107. CT scan imaging is a poor predictor of the largest stone dimension for distal ureteral calculi. Caution should be used in counseling patients on the rate of spontaneous stone passage when determined using CT measurements of stone size.


werpet's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.