To insert individual citation into a bibliography in a word-processor,
select your preferred citation style below and drag-and-drop it into the document.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 8, No. 2. (April 2012), pp. 383-385, doi:10.1002/ieam.1284 Key: citeulike:10656711
Formatted Citation
Show HTML
Likes
(beta)
This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.
Population models are considered as one method for chemical risk assessment, especially for addressing protection goals within the ecosystem services concept (EFSA 2010). Such models have a long history in ecology and they are increasingly being used also for the risk assessment of pesticides (Barnthouse et al. 2007; Forbes et al. 2009). However, it is frequently debated to what extent population models are useful for risk assessment and if their output can be considered realistic, or if they produce rather fictitious predictions. Population models are necessarily more complex than standard methods used in pesticide risk assessment. Although the higher complexity is due to the aim to produce a population model that is as realistic as possible, it is understandable that regulators require a detailed evaluation of the realism and suitability of these models. We therefore address the question of how to evaluate whether a model is sufficiently realistic for use in pesticide risk assessment. We believe that a systematic approach may help regulators to evaluate population models.
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.