CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

NEPA, EPA and risk assessment: Has EPA lost its way?

by: Edward J. Calabrese
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 64, No. 2. (November 2012), pp. 267-268, doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.08.018  Key: citeulike:11167236

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

The EPA risk assessment practice denies the inclusion of beneficial responses in the evaluation process. This practice represents a marked deviation from the original guidelines set forth within NEPA, which required the integrated goal of environmental protection as including both a reduction in risk as well as an enhancement of health benefit. It is time for regulatory agencies such as EPA to incorporate both harm and benefit within its risk assessment process. ⺠EPA’s risk assessment process needs to incorporate benefit as well as harm. ⺠The NEPA act provided a frame work for the incorporation of benefits within the risk assessment process. ⺠The hormetic response is the only dose response that is able to incorporate benefit and harm.


wqunit's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.