![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
yoriyuki's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
A sequent calculus for limit computable mathematicsAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic In Special Issue: Classical Logic and Computation (2006), Vol. 153, No. 1-3. (April 2008), pp. 111-126.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractWe introduce an implication-free fragment of [omega]-arithmetic, having Exchange rule for sequents dropped. Exchange rule for formulas is, instead, an admissible rule in . Our main result is that cut-free proofs of are isomorphic with recursive winning strategies of a set of games called "1-backtracking games" in [S. Berardi, Th. Coquand, S. Hayashi, Games with 1-backtracking, Games for Logic and Programming Languages, Edinburgh, April 2005]. We also show that is a sound and complete formal system for the implication-free fragment of LCM (Limit Computable Mathematics, see [S. Hayashi, Mathematics based on Learning, Algorithmic Learning Theory, in: LNAI, vol. 2533, Springer, pp. 7-21; S. Hayashi, Can proofs be animated by games? in: P. Urzyczyn (Ed.), Seventh International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3461, 2005, pp. 11-22. Invited paper]). A simple syntactical description of this fragment was still missing. No sound and complete formal system is known for LCM itself.
BibTeX record
RIS record