Rethinking Subculture: An Interactionist AnalysisThe American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 85, No. 1. (July 1979), pp. 1-20.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Notes for this articleAlterity: http://www.zephoria.org/alterity/archives/2005/05/gary_alan_fine.html
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractSubculture, despite the term's wide usage in sociology, has not proved to be a very satisfactory explanatory concept. Several problems in previous subculture research are discussed: (1) the confusion between subculture and subsociety, (2) the lack of a meaningful referent for subcultures, (3) the homogeneity and stasis associated with the concept, and (4) the emphasis on defining subcultures in terms of values and central themes. It is argued that for the subculture construct to be of maximal usefulness it needs to be linked to processes of interaction. Subculture is re-conceptualized in terms of cultural spread occurring through an interlocking group network characterized by multiple group membership, weak ties, structural roles conducive to information spread between groups, and media diffusion. Identification with the referent group serves to motivate the potential member to adopt the artifacts, behaviors, norms, and values characteristic of the subculture. Youth subcultures are presented as illustrations of these processes operate.
BibTeX record
RIS record